unpaid internships: indentured labour in public history

Posted: 06/09/2013 in free archaeology, News & Analysis
Tags: , , ,

History@Work recently held a round table on Unpaid Internships: A Foot in the Door or a Step Backward? I don’t want to go through everything all over again, I just want to highlight two things…

Unpaid internship is unpaid labour

It is remarkably common for advocates of unpaid internship to recognise that it is unpaid labour, and thus (probably) a violation of minimum wage laws; and that it is at least as important for networking as it is for experience, and thus (definitely) disadvantageous to those who cannot afford to perform unpaid labour.

So Regional Research Associates’ public historian Deborah Morse-Kahn argued that, ‘while the agency offering the internship got unpaid labor, I got solid experience and became known to the CRM community’.

Since when was indentured servitude a bad thing?… Since 1920, you say?

Any argument that begins ‘in general, I am against… indentured servitude’ ends badly. And public history internship coordinator and lecturer Jane Becker considered that,

In general, I am against the practice of indentured servitude, but creating unpaid positions that serve individual goals and needs can be an effective and even necessary step in gaining professional experience and credentials necessary to gain a paying job.

Indentured labour is wrong, and exploiting your freedom to be exploited in order to privilege yourself over your colleagues is bad for you, your colleagues, your institution and your profession.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s